LAK
4–1
WPG
Final · W
Los Angeles Kings
LAK · 42-23-9
4–1
FinalW
Winnipeg Jets
WPG · 51-20-4
1ST2ND3RDT
LAK
2101812420
WPG
071706120
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 3 this season — the Kings lead the season series 3–0
LAK 42-23-9 · WPG 51-20-4 · Meeting 3 this season — the Kings lead the season series 3–0
Kings beat the Jets
Chances were even (1.2 to 1.3 expected goals); the Kings won 4–1. Connor Hellebuyck allowed 1.8 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
Chances were close: 1.2 expected goals to 1.3, on 20 and 20 shots on goal.
LAK 1.2 xG · 20 shots
WPG 1.3 xG · 20 shots
0
1
1st
0.4 · 0.3
2nd
0.6 · 0.5
3rd
0.2 · 0.4
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Trevor Moore · 1st 08:28 · 1–0 · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
2
Anze Kopitar · 1st 09:50 · 2–0 · snap shot, a good chance (10%)
3
Cole Perfetti · 2nd 11:40 · 2–1 · snap shot, a good chance (17%)
4
Andrei Kuzmenko · 2nd 16:07 · 3–1 · wrist shot off the rush, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
5
Adrian Kempe · 3rd 19:05 · 4–1 · wrist shot, into an empty net
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Kings win 48.
LAK 48%WPG 52%
Goals and penalties
5 goals · 0 penalties← Kings shoot this way
Jets shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Trevor Moore · 1st 08:28 · 1–0
Tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
2
Anze Kopitar · 1st 09:50 · GWG · 2–0
Snap shot, a good chance (10%)
3
Cole Perfetti · 2nd 11:40 · 2–1
Snap shot, a good chance (17%)
4
Andrei Kuzmenko · 2nd 16:07 · 3–1
Wrist shot off the rush, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
5
Adrian Kempe · 3rd 19:05 · EN · 4–1
Wrist shot, into an empty net
1st period
2nd period
4
Unassisted · wrist shot off the rush, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
3–1
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
19/20 saves · 1 GA · 1.3 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
16/19 saves · 3 GA · 1.2 xGA
Allowed 1.8 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
