NSH
0–1
VAN
Final · L
Nashville Predators
NSH · 2-4
0–1
FinalL
Vancouver Canucks
VAN · 4-2
1ST2ND3RDT
NSH
0601309028
VAN
05012112129
goals · shots on goal
Game 6 — the Predators trail the series 2–4
NSH 2-4 · VAN 4-2 · Game 6 — the Predators trail the series 2–4
Predators fell to the Canucks
The Predators created the better chances (3.0 to 1.8 expected goals) — and lost 0–1. Arturs Silovs stopped 3.0 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Predators created the better chances: 3.0 expected goals to 1.8, on 28 and 29 shots on goal.
NSH 3.0 xG · 28 shots
VAN 1.8 xG · 29 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
0.6 · 0.2
2nd · the swing
1.6 · 0.8
3rd
0.9 · 0.8
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Pius Suter · 3rd 18:21 · 0–1 · wrist shot, a good chance (16%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Predators win 71.
NSH 71%VAN 29%
Goals and penalties
1 goal · 0 penalties← Predators shoot this way
Canucks shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Pius Suter · 3rd 18:21 · GWG · 0–1
Wrist shot, a good chance (16%)
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
No goals or penalties.
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
28/29 saves · 1 GA · 1.8 xGA
Stopped 0.8 more goals than an average goalie would have.
28/28 saves · 0 GA · 3.0 xGA
Stopped 3.0 more goals than an average goalie would have.
