PHI
0–3
VAN
Final · L
Philadelphia Flyers
PHI · 1-3-1
0–3
FinalL
Vancouver Canucks
VAN · 2-1-2
1ST2ND3RDT
PHI
0701207026
VAN
11521304332
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
PHI 1-3-1 · VAN 2-1-2 · Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
Flyers fell to the Canucks
The Flyers created the better chances (3.2 to 1.7 expected goals) — and lost 0–3. Kevin Lankinen stopped 3.2 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Flyers created the better chances: 3.2 expected goals to 1.7, on 26 and 32 shots on goal.
PHI 3.2 xG · 26 shots
VAN 1.7 xG · 32 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
0.7 · 0.6
2nd
1.2 · 1.0
3rd · the swing
1.3 · 0.2
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Nils Hoglander · 1st 16:09 · 0–1 · wrist shot, a good chance (12%)
2
Brock Boeser · 2nd 08:40 · 0–2 · backhand shot, a good chance (15%)
3
Kiefer Sherwood · 2nd 09:30 · 0–3 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Flyers win 75.
PHI 75%VAN 25%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Flyers shoot this way
Canucks shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Nils Hoglander · 1st 16:09 · GWG · 0–1
Wrist shot, a good chance (12%)
2
Brock Boeser · 2nd 08:40 · 0–2
Backhand shot, a good chance (15%)
3
Kiefer Sherwood · 2nd 09:30 · 0–3
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No goals or penalties.
No penalties
Goaltending
29/32 saves · 3 GA · 1.7 xGA
Allowed 1.3 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
26/26 saves · 0 GA · 3.2 xGA
Stopped 3.2 more goals than an average goalie would have.
