STL
1–0
UTA
Final · W
St. Louis Blues
STL · 9-10-7
1–0
FinalW
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 12-11-3
1ST2ND3RDT
STL
081803119
UTA
0404010018
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
STL 9-10-7 · UTA 12-11-3 · Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
Blues beat the Mammoth
The Blues earned it: 2.7 expected goals to 2.1, and a 1–0 win to show for it. Joel Hofer stopped 2.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Blues created the better chances: 2.7 expected goals to 2.1, on 19 and 18 shots on goal.
STL 2.7 xG · 19 shots
UTA 2.1 xG · 18 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
1.0 · 0.4
2nd
1.2 · 0.6
3rd
0.6 · 1.1
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Dylan Holloway · 2nd 18:10 · 1–0 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Blues win 61.
STL 61%UTA 39%
Goals and penalties
1 goal · 0 penalties← Blues shoot this way
Mammoth shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Dylan Holloway · 2nd 18:10 · GWG · 1–0
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
3rd period
No goals or penalties.
No penalties
Goaltending
18/18 saves · 0 GA · 2.1 xGA
Stopped 2.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
18/19 saves · 1 GA · 2.7 xGA
Stopped 1.7 more goals than an average goalie would have.
