UTA
2–1
BOS
Final / OT · W
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 4-1-1
2–1
Final / OTW
Boston Bruins
BOS · 3-2-1
1ST2ND3RDOTT
UTA
0100111813232
BOS
06190700122
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 1–0
UTA 4-1-1 · BOS 3-2-1 · First meeting this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 1–0
Mammoth beat the Bruins
The Mammoth earned it: 2.7 expected goals to 2.1, and they won it in overtime on Kesselring's goal. Connor Ingram stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Mammoth created the better chances: 2.7 expected goals to 2.1, on 32 and 22 shots on goal.
UTA 2.7 xG · 32 shots
BOS 2.1 xG · 22 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
0.6 · 0.8
2nd
0.7 · 0.3
3rd
0.9 · 1.0
OT
0.5 · 0.0
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Cole Koepke · 2nd 12:49 · 0–1 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
2
Vladislav Kolyachonok · 3rd 14:51 · 1–1 · backhand shot, a good chance (13%)
3
Michael Kesselring · OT 02:46 · 2–1 · snap shot, a good chance (16%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 60.
UTA 60%BOS 40%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Mammoth shoot this way
Bruins shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Cole Koepke · 2nd 12:49 · 0–1
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
2
Vladislav Kolyachonok · 3rd 14:51 · 1–1
Backhand shot, a good chance (13%)
3
Michael Kesselring · OT 02:46 · GWG · 2–1
Snap shot, a good chance (16%)
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
3rd period
Overtime
No penalties
Goaltending
21/22 saves · 1 GA · 2.1 xGA
Stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
30/32 saves · 2 GA · 2.7 xGA
Stopped 0.7 more goals than an average goalie would have.
