UTA 4–1 CAR Final · W
Mammoth/Schedule/Recap Thu, Nov 14, 2024 · 2024-25 regular season
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 7-6-3
4–1
FinalW
Carolina Hurricanes
CAR · 11-4-0
1ST2ND3RDT UTA 180538421 CAR 015117018150 goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 1–0
UTA 7-6-3 · CAR 11-4-0 · First meeting this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 1–0

Mammoth beat the Hurricanes

The Mammoth were outchanced (5.9 to 2.0 expected goals) but won 4–1 anyway. Karel Vejmelka stopped 4.9 more goals than an average goalie would have.

Who had the better chances

The Hurricanes created the better chances: 5.9 expected goals to 2.0, on 50 and 21 shots on goal.

UTA 2.0 xG · 21 shots CAR 5.9 xG · 50 shots
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1st 0.5 · 1.1
2nd · the swing 0.4 · 2.5
3rd 1.2 · 2.3
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 8.
UTA 8%CAR 92%

Goals and penalties

5 goals · 0 penalties
← Mammoth shoot this way Hurricanes shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
Unassisted · snap shot, a good chance (23%)
1–0
2nd period
2
10:04 Martin Necas PP
Shayne Gostisbehere, Sebastian Aho · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
1–1
3rd period
3
05:09 Jack McBain GWG
Michael Kesselring · snap shot, a good chance (22%)
2–1
4
Dylan Guenther, Matias Maccelli · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
3–1
5
Michael Kesselring, Clayton Keller · snap shot on a rebound, a great chance (27%)
4–1
No penalties
Goaltending
+4.9
vs expected
49/50 saves · 1 GA · 5.9 xGA Stopped 4.9 more goals than an average goalie would have.
−1.5
vs expected
15/18 saves · 3 GA · 1.5 xGA Allowed 1.5 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
Team UTACAR
Shots on goal
21
50
Expected goals
2.0
5.9
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
0/0
1/0
Penalty minutes
0
0