UTA
1–2
DAL
Final · L
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 10-11-4
1–2
FinalL
Dallas Stars
DAL · 16-8-0
1ST2ND3RDT
UTA
013011113137
DAL
082607221
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Mammoth trail the season series 0–1
UTA 10-11-4 · DAL 16-8-0 · First meeting this season — the Mammoth trail the season series 0–1
Mammoth fell to the Stars
The Mammoth created the better chances (2.9 to 1.9 expected goals) — and lost 1–2. Casey DeSmith stopped 1.9 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Mammoth created the better chances: 2.9 expected goals to 1.9, on 37 and 21 shots on goal.
UTA 2.9 xG · 37 shots
DAL 1.9 xG · 21 shots
0
1
2
3
1st · the swing
1.5 · 0.6
2nd
0.8 · 0.6
3rd
0.7 · 0.7
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Evgenii Dadonov · 2nd 07:07 · 0–1 · snap shot, a good chance (14%)
2
Jamie Benn · 2nd 19:17 · 0–2 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
3
Nick Schmaltz · 3rd 06:57 · 1–2 · snap shot, a good chance (16%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 67.
UTA 67%DAL 33%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Mammoth shoot this way
Stars shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Evgenii Dadonov · 2nd 07:07 · PP · 0–1
Snap shot, a good chance (14%)
2
Jamie Benn · 2nd 19:17 · GWG · 0–2
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
3
Nick Schmaltz · 3rd 06:57 · 1–2
Snap shot, a good chance (16%)
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
19/21 saves · 2 GA · 1.9 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
36/37 saves · 1 GA · 2.9 xGA
Stopped 1.9 more goals than an average goalie would have.
