UTA 4–2 STL Final · W
Mammoth/Schedule/Recap Sun, Jan 19, 2025 · 2024-25 regular season
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 19-19-7
4–2
FinalW
St. Louis Blues
STL · 22-21-4
1ST2ND3RDT UTA 3171907433 STL 161909224 goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 2–0
UTA 19-19-7 · STL 22-21-4 · Meeting 2 this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 2–0

Mammoth beat the Blues

Chances were even (2.5 to 2.4 expected goals); the Mammoth won 4–2. Jordan Binnington allowed 1.5 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.

Who had the better chances

Chances were close: 2.5 expected goals to 2.4, on 33 and 24 shots on goal.

UTA 2.5 xG · 33 shots STL 2.4 xG · 24 shots
0
1
2
1st · the swing 1.1 · 0.2
2nd 1.1 · 1.2
3rd 0.3 · 1.0
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 52.
UTA 52%STL 48%

Goals and penalties

6 goals · 0 penalties
← Mammoth shoot this way Blues shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
02:05 Tyler Tucker
Oskar Sundqvist · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
0–1
2
Logan Cooley, Clayton Keller · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (7%) that found a way in
1–1
3
Clayton Keller, John Marino · snap shot, a great chance (29%)
2–1
4
10:31 Clayton Keller GWG
Logan Cooley · snap shot, a great chance (25%)
3–1
2nd period
5
01:32 Jake Neighbours PP
Dylan Holloway, Brayden Schenn · snap shot on a rebound, a great chance (28%)
3–2
6
10:42 Logan Cooley
Clayton Keller, Juuso Välimäki · snap shot, a good chance (19%)
4–2
3rd period
No goals or penalties.
No penalties
Goaltending
+0.4
vs expected
22/24 saves · 2 GA · 2.4 xGA Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
−1.5
vs expected
29/33 saves · 4 GA · 2.5 xGA Allowed 1.5 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
Team UTASTL
Shots on goal
33
24
Expected goals
2.5
2.4
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
1/0
1/0
Penalty minutes
0
0