UTA 2–3 PIT Final / OT · L
Mammoth/Schedule/Recap Thu, Jan 30, 2025 · 2024-25 regular season
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 21-21-8
2–3
Final / OTL
Pittsburgh Penguins
PIT · 21-24-8
1ST2ND3RDOTT UTA 112170901229 PIT 041151911329 goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
UTA 21-21-8 · PIT 21-24-8 · Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1

Mammoth fell to the Penguins

Chances were even (2.9 to 3.0 expected goals); the Mammoth lost it in overtime on Crosby's goal.

Who had the better chances

Chances were close: 2.9 expected goals to 3.0, on 29 and 29 shots on goal.

UTA 2.9 xG · 29 shots PIT 3.0 xG · 29 shots
0
1
2
3
1st 1.0 · 0.5
2nd 0.9 · 1.4
3rd 0.8 · 0.7
OT 0.2 · 0.5
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 48.
UTA 48%PIT 52%

Goals and penalties

5 goals · 0 penalties
← Mammoth shoot this way Penguins shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
14:51 Mikhail Sergachev PP
Nick Schmaltz, Logan Cooley · snap shot, a good chance (11%)
1–0
2nd period
2
06:40 Marcus Pettersson
Sidney Crosby, Matt Grzelcyk · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (4%) that found a way in
1–1
3
08:36 Michael Carcone
John Marino, Nick Bjugstad · snap shot on a rebound, a great chance (48%)
2–1
3rd period
4
06:17 Erik Karlsson
Unassisted · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (4%) that found a way in
2–2
Overtime
5
03:54 Sidney Crosby GWG
Cody Glass, Rickard Rakell · backhand shot, a good chance (19%)
2–3
No penalties
Goaltending
0.0
vs expected
26/29 saves · 3 GA · 3.0 xGA Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
+0.9
vs expected
27/29 saves · 2 GA · 2.9 xGA Stopped 0.9 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Team UTAPIT
Shots on goal
29
29
Expected goals
2.9
3.0
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
1/0
0/0
Penalty minutes
0
0