UTA 3–2 PHI Final / OT · W
Mammoth/Schedule/Recap Wed, Feb 5, 2025 · 2024-25 regular season
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 22-22-9
3–2
Final / OTW
Philadelphia Flyers
PHI · 23-25-7
1ST2ND3RDOTT UTA 01211311215342 PHI 110140501220 goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 2–0
UTA 22-22-9 · PHI 23-25-7 · Meeting 2 this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 2–0

Mammoth beat the Flyers

The Mammoth earned it: 4.1 expected goals to 1.9, and they won it in overtime on Guenther's goal. Samuel Ersson stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.

Who had the better chances

The Mammoth created the better chances: 4.1 expected goals to 1.9, on 42 and 20 shots on goal.

UTA 4.1 xG · 42 shots PHI 1.9 xG · 20 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st 0.8 · 0.7
2nd 1.5 · 0.7
3rd · the swing 1.2 · 0.3
OT 0.6 · 0.1
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 81.
UTA 81%PHI 19%

Goals and penalties

5 goals · 0 penalties
← Mammoth shoot this way Flyers shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
Travis Sanheim · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
0–1
2nd period
2
Dylan Guenther, Barrett Hayton · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (3%) that found a way in
1–1
3
Sean Couturier, Bobby Brink · tip in shot, a great chance (25%)
1–2
3rd period
4
Barrett Hayton, Mikhail Sergachev · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
2–2
Overtime
5
04:59 Dylan Guenther GWG
Mikhail Sergachev, Clayton Keller · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
3–2
No penalties
Goaltending
−0.1
vs expected
18/20 saves · 2 GA · 1.9 xGA Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
+1.1
vs expected
39/42 saves · 3 GA · 4.1 xGA Stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Team UTAPHI
Shots on goal
42
20
Expected goals
4.1
1.9
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
0/0
0/0
Penalty minutes
0
0