UTA
2–1
VAN
Final · W
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 25-24-9
2–1
FinalW
Vancouver Canucks
VAN · 26-20-11
1ST2ND3RDT
UTA
011111110232
VAN
041507116
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 2–0
UTA 25-24-9 · VAN 26-20-11 · Meeting 2 this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 2–0
Mammoth beat the Canucks
The Mammoth earned it: 3.0 expected goals to 2.1, and a 2–1 win to show for it. Karel Vejmelka stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Mammoth created the better chances: 3.0 expected goals to 2.1, on 32 and 16 shots on goal.
UTA 3.0 xG · 32 shots
VAN 2.1 xG · 16 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
1.1 · 0.5
2nd
0.8 · 0.8
3rd
1.1 · 0.9
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Jake DeBrusk · 2nd 01:43 · 0–1 · snap shot, a great chance (25%)
2
Logan Cooley · 2nd 03:51 · 1–1 · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
3
Dylan Guenther · 3rd 14:07 · 2–1 · tip in shot, a good chance (13%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 65.
UTA 65%VAN 35%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Mammoth shoot this way
Canucks shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Jake DeBrusk · 2nd 01:43 · PP · 0–1
Snap shot, a great chance (25%)
2
Logan Cooley · 2nd 03:51 · 1–1
Tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
3
Dylan Guenther · 3rd 14:07 · PP · GWG · 2–1
Tip in shot, a good chance (13%)
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
15/16 saves · 1 GA · 2.1 xGA
Stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
30/32 saves · 2 GA · 3.0 xGA
Stopped 1.0 more goals than an average goalie would have.
