UTA 4–1 WPG Final · W
Mammoth/Schedule/Recap Sat, Apr 5, 2025 · 2024-25 regular season
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 35-30-12
4–1
FinalW
Winnipeg Jets
WPG · 52-21-4
1ST2ND3RDT UTA 11121116428 WPG 07012114133 goals · shots on goal
Meeting 4 this season — the season series is tied 2–2
UTA 35-30-12 · WPG 52-21-4 · Meeting 4 this season — the season series is tied 2–2

Mammoth beat the Jets

The Mammoth were outchanced (3.8 to 3.2 expected goals) but won 4–1 anyway. Karel Vejmelka stopped 2.8 more goals than an average goalie would have.

Who had the better chances

The Jets created the better chances: 3.8 expected goals to 3.2, on 33 and 28 shots on goal.

UTA 3.2 xG · 28 shots WPG 3.8 xG · 33 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st 1.4 · 0.8
2nd 1.2 · 1.5
3rd · the swing 0.6 · 1.5
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 41.
UTA 41%WPG 59%

Goals and penalties

5 goals · 0 penalties
← Mammoth shoot this way Jets shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
04:24 Clayton Keller PP
Barrett Hayton, Nick Schmaltz · snap shot, a good chance (16%)
1–0
2nd period
2
00:57 Barrett Hayton PPGWG
Dylan Guenther, Clayton Keller · backhand shot, a good chance (15%)
2–0
3
Mikhail Sergachev, John Marino · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (3%) that found a way in
3–0
3rd period
4
02:45 Mark Scheifele PP
Unassisted · wrist shot, a good chance (11%)
3–1
5
17:19 Nick Bjugstad EN
Kevin Stenlund, Olli Maatta · snap shot, into an empty net
4–1
No penalties
Goaltending
+2.8
vs expected
32/33 saves · 1 GA · 3.8 xGA Stopped 2.8 more goals than an average goalie would have.
+0.2
vs expected
24/27 saves · 3 GA · 3.2 xGA Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
Team UTAWPG
Shots on goal
28
33
Expected goals
3.2
3.8
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
2/0
1/0
Penalty minutes
0
0