UTA
3–2
NYR
Final · W
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 11-8-3
3–2
FinalW
New York Rangers
NYR · 10-11-2
1ST2ND3RDT
UTA
11318113334
NYR
1121307222
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 1–0
UTA 11-8-3 · NYR 10-11-2 · First meeting this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 1–0
Mammoth beat the Rangers
The Mammoth earned it: 3.4 expected goals to 2.8, and a 3–2 win to show for it.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Mammoth created the better chances: 3.4 expected goals to 2.8, on 34 and 22 shots on goal.
UTA 3.4 xG · 34 shots
NYR 2.8 xG · 22 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
1.1 · 1.1
2nd
1.0 · 0.6
3rd
1.4 · 1.1
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
JJ Peterka · 1st 10:08 · 1–0 · poke shot on a rebound, a great chance (34%)
2
Vladislav Gavrikov · 1st 15:19 · 1–1 · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
3
Artemi Panarin · 2nd 08:07 · 1–2 · snap shot, a good chance (14%)
4
Clayton Keller · 2nd 11:15 · 2–2 · snap shot, a great chance (35%)
5
Nick DeSimone · 3rd 07:32 · 3–2 · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (4%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 59.
UTA 59%NYR 41%
Goals and penalties
5 goals · 0 penalties← Mammoth shoot this way
Rangers shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
JJ Peterka · 1st 10:08 · 1–0
Poke shot on a rebound, a great chance (34%)
2
Vladislav Gavrikov · 1st 15:19 · 1–1
Tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
3
Artemi Panarin · 2nd 08:07 · 1–2
Snap shot, a good chance (14%)
4
Clayton Keller · 2nd 11:15 · 2–2
Snap shot, a great chance (35%)
5
Nick DeSimone · 3rd 07:32 · GWG · 3–2
Slap shot, a low-percentage shot (4%) that found a way in
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
5
Unassisted · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (4%) that found a way in
3–2
No penalties
Goaltending
20/22 saves · 2 GA · 2.8 xGA
Stopped 0.8 more goals than an average goalie would have.
31/34 saves · 3 GA · 3.4 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
