UTA 4–2 STL Final · W
Mammoth/Schedule/Recap Fri, Jan 9, 2026 · 2025-26 regular season
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 22-20-3
4–2
FinalW
St. Louis Blues
STL · 17-20-8
1ST2ND3RDT UTA 162918423 STL 0132609228 goals · shots on goal
Meeting 3 this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 2–1
UTA 22-20-3 · STL 17-20-8 · Meeting 3 this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 2–1

Mammoth beat the Blues

The Mammoth were outchanced (3.6 to 2.9 expected goals) but won 4–2 anyway. Karel Vejmelka stopped 1.6 more goals than an average goalie would have.

Who had the better chances

The Blues created the better chances: 3.6 expected goals to 2.9, on 28 and 23 shots on goal.

UTA 2.9 xG · 23 shots STL 3.6 xG · 28 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st 0.9 · 1.6
2nd 0.9 · 0.7
3rd 1.1 · 1.4
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 38.
UTA 38%STL 62%

Goals and penalties

6 goals · 0 penalties
← Mammoth shoot this way Blues shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
Clayton Keller, Mikhail Sergachev · snap shot on a rebound, a low-percentage shot (7%) that found a way in
1–0
2nd period
2
Clayton Keller, John Marino · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
2–0
3
Nathan Walker · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (2%) that found a way in
2–1
4
11:43 Sean Durzi GWG
Nick Schmaltz, Lawson Crouse · snap shot, a good chance (14%)
3–1
5
16:27 Pavel Buchnevich EXTRA ATTACKER
Jimmy Snuggerud, Robert Thomas · wrist shot, a great chance (30%)
3–2
3rd period
6
06:57 Nick Schmaltz PP
JJ Peterka, Clayton Keller · snap shot, a good chance (21%)
4–2
No penalties
Goaltending
+1.6
vs expected
26/28 saves · 2 GA · 3.6 xGA Stopped 1.6 more goals than an average goalie would have.
−1.1
vs expected
19/23 saves · 4 GA · 2.9 xGA Allowed 1.1 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
Team UTASTL
Shots on goal
23
28
Expected goals
2.9
3.6
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
1/0
0/0
Penalty minutes
0
0