UTA
2–1
DAL
Final · W
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 24-20-4
2–1
FinalW
Dallas Stars
DAL · 27-12-9
1ST2ND3RDT
UTA
01011017227
DAL
05012110127
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
UTA 24-20-4 · DAL 27-12-9 · Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
Mammoth beat the Stars
The Mammoth were outchanced (2.8 to 2.2 expected goals) but won 2–1 anyway. Karel Vejmelka stopped 1.8 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Stars created the better chances: 2.8 expected goals to 2.2, on 27 and 27 shots on goal.
UTA 2.2 xG · 27 shots
DAL 2.8 xG · 27 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
0.7 · 0.4
2nd
0.9 · 0.9
3rd · the swing
0.6 · 1.5
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Nick Schmaltz · 2nd 19:53 · 1–0 · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
2
Mikko Rantanen · 3rd 02:04 · 1–1 · wrist shot on a rebound, a great chance (57%)
3
John Marino · 3rd 04:03 · 2–1 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 40.
UTA 40%DAL 60%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Mammoth shoot this way
Stars shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Nick Schmaltz · 2nd 19:53 · 1–0
Tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
2
Mikko Rantanen · 3rd 02:04 · PP · 1–1
Wrist shot on a rebound, a great chance (57%)
3
John Marino · 3rd 04:03 · GWG · 2–1
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
26/27 saves · 1 GA · 2.8 xGA
Stopped 1.8 more goals than an average goalie would have.
25/27 saves · 2 GA · 2.2 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
