UTA 4–1 DET Final · W
Mammoth/Schedule/Recap Wed, Feb 4, 2026 · 2025-26 regular season
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 30-23-4
4–1
FinalW
Detroit Red Wings
DET · 33-19-6
1ST2ND3RDT UTA 290927425 DET 06011113130 goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 2–0
UTA 30-23-4 · DET 33-19-6 · Meeting 2 this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 2–0

Mammoth beat the Red Wings

Chances were even (2.2 to 2.1 expected goals); the Mammoth won 4–1. Karel Vejmelka stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.

Who had the better chances

Chances were close: 2.2 expected goals to 2.1, on 25 and 30 shots on goal.

UTA 2.2 xG · 25 shots DET 2.1 xG · 30 shots
0
1
2
1st 1.0 · 0.5
2nd 0.6 · 0.8
3rd 0.6 · 0.8
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 51.
UTA 51%DET 49%

Goals and penalties

5 goals · 0 penalties
← Mammoth shoot this way Red Wings shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
00:57 Sean Durzi
Unassisted · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
1–0
2
08:11 Nick Schmaltz PPGWG
Barrett Hayton, Clayton Keller · snap shot, a great chance (27%)
2–0
2nd period
No goals or penalties.
3rd period
3
04:40 Dylan Guenther
Unassisted · wrist shot, a good chance (19%)
3–0
4
15:52 Dylan Larkin EXTRA ATTACKER
James van Riemsdyk, Moritz Seider · wrist shot, a good chance (17%)
3–1
5
17:42 Clayton Keller EN
Nick Schmaltz, Lawson Crouse · snap shot, into an empty net
4–1
No penalties
Goaltending
+1.1
vs expected
29/30 saves · 1 GA · 2.1 xGA Stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
−0.8
vs expected
21/24 saves · 3 GA · 2.2 xGA Allowed 0.8 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
Team UTADET
Shots on goal
25
30
Expected goals
2.2
2.1
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
1/0
0/0
Penalty minutes
0
0