UTA 4–3 LAK Final / OT · W
Mammoth/Schedule/Recap Sun, Mar 22, 2026 · 2025-26 regular season
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 37-28-6
4–3
Final / OTW
Los Angeles Kings
LAK · 28-25-17
1ST2ND3RDOTT UTA 2151601211434 LAK 21201011400336 goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
UTA 37-28-6 · LAK 28-25-17 · Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1

Mammoth beat the Kings

Chances were even (4.0 to 4.2 expected goals); the Mammoth won it in overtime on Schmaltz's goal.

Who had the better chances

Chances were close: 4.0 expected goals to 4.2, on 34 and 36 shots on goal.

UTA 4.0 xG · 34 shots LAK 4.2 xG · 36 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st 1.6 · 1.2
2nd 0.6 · 1.1
3rd 1.4 · 1.7
OT 0.4 · 0.1
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 47.
UTA 47%LAK 53%

Goals and penalties

7 goals · 0 penalties
← Mammoth shoot this way Kings shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
John Marino · snap shot, a great chance (27%)
1–0
2
Quinton Byfield · snap shot, a good chance (13%)
1–1
3
Alexander Kerfoot, Kevin Stenlund · snap shot, a good chance (16%)
2–1
4
Unassisted · snap shot, a good chance (12%)
2–2
2nd period
5
Clayton Keller, Lawson Crouse · bat shot on a rebound, a low-percentage shot (2%) that found a way in
3–2
3rd period
6
Drew Doughty · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (3%) that found a way in
3–3
Overtime
7
01:46 Nick Schmaltz GWG
Mikhail Sergachev, Kevin Stenlund · snap shot, a great chance (37%)
4–3
No penalties
Goaltending
+0.7
vs expected
33/36 saves · 3 GA · 3.7 xGA Stopped 0.7 more goals than an average goalie would have.
−0.5
vs expected
30/34 saves · 4 GA · 3.5 xGA Allowed 0.5 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
Team UTALAK
Shots on goal
34
36
Expected goals
4.0
4.2
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
0/0
0/0
Penalty minutes
0
0