UTA 1–4 CAR Final · L
Mammoth/Schedule/Recap Sat, Apr 11, 2026 · 2025-26 regular season
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 42-31-6
1–4
FinalL
Carolina Hurricanes
CAR · 52-22-6
1ST2ND3RDT UTA 0807112127 CAR 21205212429 goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the Mammoth trail the season series 0–2
UTA 42-31-6 · CAR 52-22-6 · Meeting 2 this season — the Mammoth trail the season series 0–2

Mammoth fell to the Hurricanes

The Mammoth were outchanced (2.8 to 2.2 expected goals) and lost 1–4. The Hurricanes owned the 1st period, 1.5 to 0.5 in expected goals.

Who had the better chances

The Hurricanes created the better chances: 2.8 expected goals to 2.2, on 29 and 27 shots on goal.

UTA 2.2 xG · 27 shots CAR 2.8 xG · 29 shots
0
1
2
3
1st · the swing 0.5 · 1.5
2nd 0.7 · 0.3
3rd 1.0 · 1.1
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 38.
UTA 38%CAR 62%

Goals and penalties

5 goals · 0 penalties
← Mammoth shoot this way Hurricanes shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
04:25 Andrei Svechnikov PP
Nikolaj Ehlers, Shayne Gostisbehere · backhand shot on a rebound, a good chance (15%)
0–1
2
13:23 Jordan Staal GWG
Nikolaj Ehlers, Jordan Martinook · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
0–2
2nd period
No goals or penalties.
3rd period
3
02:42 Dylan Guenther PP
Clayton Keller, Mikhail Sergachev · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (4%) that found a way in
1–2
4
15:31 Sebastian Aho
Shayne Gostisbehere, Jaccob Slavin · tip in shot, a good chance (15%)
1–3
5
19:37 Sean Walker EN
Jordan Martinook, Jordan Staal · wrist shot, into an empty net
1–4
No penalties
Goaltending
+0.1
vs expected
25/28 saves · 3 GA · 3.1 xGA Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
+0.7
vs expected
26/27 saves · 1 GA · 1.7 xGA Stopped 0.7 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Team UTACAR
Shots on goal
27
29
Expected goals
2.2
2.8
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
1/0
1/0
Penalty minutes
0
0