UTA 4–2 VGK Final · W
Mammoth/Schedule/Recap Fri, Apr 24, 2026 · 2025-26 playoffs
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 2-1
4–2
FinalW
Vegas Golden Knights
VGK · 1-2
1ST2ND3RDT UTA 262501412 VGK 01311019232 goals · shots on goal
Game 3 — the Mammoth lead the series 2–1
UTA 2-1 · VGK 1-2 · Game 3 — the Mammoth lead the series 2–1

Mammoth beat the Golden Knights

The Mammoth were outchanced (4.2 to 1.8 expected goals) but won 4–2 anyway. Carter Hart allowed 3.1 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.

Who had the better chances

The Golden Knights created the better chances: 4.2 expected goals to 1.8, on 32 and 12 shots on goal.

UTA 1.8 xG · 12 shots VGK 4.2 xG · 32 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st 0.9 · 0.8
2nd 0.6 · 1.5
3rd · the swing 0.3 · 1.8
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 17.
UTA 17%VGK 83%

Goals and penalties

6 goals · 0 penalties
← Mammoth shoot this way Golden Knights shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
Liam O'Brien, Kailer Yamamoto · slap shot, a great chance (28%)
1–0
2
17:45 Dylan Guenther PP
Logan Cooley, Clayton Keller · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (7%) that found a way in
2–0
2nd period
3
04:06 Lawson Crouse GWG
Nick Schmaltz, MacKenzie Weegar · tip in shot, a good chance (11%)
3–0
4
Clayton Keller · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
4–0
5
13:20 Jack Eichel
Ivan Barbashev, Mark Stone · backhand shot on a rebound, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
4–1
3rd period
6
16:52 Nic Dowd
Reilly Smith, Cole Smith · wrist shot, a good chance (14%)
4–2
No penalties
Goaltending
+1.3
vs expected
30/32 saves · 2 GA · 3.3 xGA Stopped 1.3 more goals than an average goalie would have.
−3.1
vs expected
8/12 saves · 4 GA · 0.9 xGA Allowed 3.1 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
Team UTAVGK
Shots on goal
12
32
Expected goals
1.8
4.2
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
1/0
0/0
Penalty minutes
0
0