UTA 1–5 VGK Final · L
Mammoth/Schedule/Recap Fri, May 1, 2026 · 2025-26 playoffs
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 2-4
1–5
FinalL
Vegas Golden Knights
VGK · 4-2
1ST2ND3RDT UTA 060819123 VGK 11011036526 goals · shots on goal
Game 6 — the Mammoth trail the series 2–4
UTA 2-4 · VGK 4-2 · Game 6 — the Mammoth trail the series 2–4

Mammoth fell to the Golden Knights

The Mammoth were outchanced (4.1 to 2.5 expected goals) and lost 1–5. Karel Vejmelka allowed 1.5 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.

Who had the better chances

The Golden Knights created the better chances: 4.1 expected goals to 2.5, on 26 and 23 shots on goal.

UTA 2.5 xG · 23 shots VGK 4.1 xG · 26 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st · the swing 1.0 · 1.8
2nd 0.7 · 1.3
3rd 0.8 · 1.0
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 27.
UTA 27%VGK 73%

Goals and penalties

6 goals · 0 penalties
← Mammoth shoot this way Golden Knights shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
15:02 Brett Howden
Mitch Marner, Mark Stone · wrist shot on a rebound, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
0–1
2nd period
2
19:15 Mitch Marner GWG
Ivan Barbashev, Noah Hanifin · slap shot, a good chance (20%)
0–2
3rd period
3
Mikhail Sergachev, MacKenzie Weegar · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
1–2
4
Brayden McNabb, Kaedan Korczak · wrist shot on a rebound, a good chance (13%)
1–3
5
12:09 Mitch Marner PP
Shea Theodore, Jack Eichel · snap shot, a great chance (46%)
1–4
6
16:24 Cole Smith EN
Unassisted · snap shot, into an empty net
1–5
No penalties
Goaltending
−1.5
vs expected
21/25 saves · 4 GA · 2.5 xGA Allowed 1.5 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
+0.6
vs expected
22/23 saves · 1 GA · 1.6 xGA Stopped 0.6 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Team UTAVGK
Shots on goal
23
26
Expected goals
2.5
4.1
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
0/0
1/0
Penalty minutes
0
0