VGK 4–2 UTA Final · W
Golden Knights/Schedule/Recap Sun, Apr 19, 2026 · 2025-26 playoffs
Vegas Golden Knights
VGK · 1-0
4–2
FinalW
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 0-1
1ST2ND3RDT VGK 09110312431 UTA 111111011233 goals · shots on goal
Game 1 — the Golden Knights lead the series 1–0
VGK 1-0 · UTA 0-1 · Game 1 — the Golden Knights lead the series 1–0

Golden Knights beat the Mammoth

The Golden Knights earned it: 3.2 expected goals to 1.7, and a 4–2 win to show for it. Karel Vejmelka allowed 1.1 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.

Who had the better chances

The Golden Knights created the better chances: 3.2 expected goals to 1.7, on 31 and 33 shots on goal.

VGK 3.2 xG · 31 shots UTA 1.7 xG · 33 shots
0
1
2
3
1st 0.7 · 0.5
2nd · the swing 1.6 · 0.6
3rd 0.9 · 0.6
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Golden Knights win 74.
VGK 74%UTA 26%

Goals and penalties

6 goals · 0 penalties
← Golden Knights shoot this way Mammoth shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
19:49 Logan Cooley
Nate Schmidt, Lawson Crouse · slap shot, a good chance (13%)
0–1
2nd period
2
Cole Smith, Brayden McNabb · poke shot, a great chance (46%)
1–1
3
Sean Durzi, Ian Cole · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
1–2
3rd period
4
05:33 Mark Stone PP
Tomas Hertl, Mitch Marner · snap shot on a rebound, a great chance (33%)
2–2
5
07:20 Nic Dowd GWG
Noah Hanifin, Colton Sissons · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
3–2
6
18:21 Ivan Barbashev EN
Noah Hanifin · wrist shot, into an empty net
4–2
No penalties
Goaltending
−0.2
vs expected
31/33 saves · 2 GA · 1.8 xGA Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
−1.1
vs expected
27/30 saves · 3 GA · 1.9 xGA Allowed 1.1 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
Team VGKUTA
Shots on goal
31
33
Expected goals
3.2
1.7
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
1/0
0/0
Penalty minutes
0
0