CHI 3–2 UTA Final / OT · W
Blackhawks/Schedule/Recap Mon, Mar 9, 2026 · 2025-26 regular season
Chicago Blackhawks
CHI · 24-29-11
3–2
Final / OTW
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 34-25-5
1ST2ND3RDOTT CHI 181110611326 UTA 26090802225 goals · shots on goal
Meeting 3 this season — the Blackhawks lead the season series 3–0
CHI 24-29-11 · UTA 34-25-5 · Meeting 3 this season — the Blackhawks lead the season series 3–0

Blackhawks beat the Mammoth

Chances were even (2.5 to 2.5 expected goals); the Blackhawks won it in overtime on Nazar's goal.

Who had the better chances

Chances were close: 2.5 expected goals to 2.5, on 26 and 25 shots on goal.

CHI 2.5 xG · 26 shots UTA 2.5 xG · 25 shots
0
1
2
1st 0.8 · 0.7
2nd 1.3 · 0.8
3rd 0.4 · 0.8
OT 0.1 · 0.2
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Blackhawks win 50.
CHI 50%UTA 50%

Goals and penalties

5 goals · 0 penalties
← Blackhawks shoot this way Mammoth shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
09:43 Barrett Hayton
Nick DeSimone, Ian Cole · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (4%) that found a way in
0–1
2
13:46 Andrew Mangiapane
Ryan Donato, Ilya Mikheyev · deflected shot, a great chance (30%)
1–1
3
16:26 Dylan Guenther
Clayton Keller, Nick Schmaltz · wrist shot, a good chance (18%)
1–2
2nd period
4
15:35 Andre Burakovsky
Connor Bedard, Ryan Greene · cradle shot, a good chance (25%)
2–2
3rd period
No goals or penalties.
Overtime
5
02:36 Frank Nazar PPGWG
Teuvo Teravainen, Connor Bedard · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (4%) that found a way in
3–2
No penalties
Goaltending
0.0
vs expected
23/25 saves · 2 GA · 2.0 xGA Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
+0.1
vs expected
23/26 saves · 3 GA · 3.1 xGA Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
Team CHIUTA
Shots on goal
26
25
Expected goals
2.5
2.5
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
1/0
0/0
Penalty minutes
0
0