UTA 4–5 SJS Final / OT · L
Mammoth/Schedule/Recap Tue, Oct 29, 2024 · 2024-25 regular season
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 4-4-2
4–5
Final / OTL
San Jose Sharks
SJS · 1-7-2
1ST2ND3RDOTT UTA 211280301423 SJS 0911731713546 goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Mammoth trail the season series 0–1
UTA 4-4-2 · SJS 1-7-2 · First meeting this season — the Mammoth trail the season series 0–1

Mammoth fell to the Sharks

The Mammoth let a 4–1 lead get away: the Sharks came back with four unanswered goals — Toffoli's equalizer with 2:42 left and the goalie pulled — and won it in overtime on Wennberg's goal. Mackenzie Blackwood allowed 1.5 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.

Who had the better chances

The Sharks created the better chances: 4.8 expected goals to 2.5, on 46 and 23 shots on goal.

UTA 2.5 xG · 23 shots SJS 4.8 xG · 46 shots
0
1
2
3
4
5
1st 0.8 · 1.4
2nd 1.2 · 1.3
3rd 0.4 · 1.1
OT · the swing 0.2 · 1.0
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 20.
UTA 20%SJS 80%

Goals and penalties

9 goals · 0 penalties
← Mammoth shoot this way Sharks shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
Clayton Keller · snap shot, a good chance (13%)
1–0
2
Ian Cole, Nick Schmaltz · backhand shot, a good chance (23%)
2–0
2nd period
3
, · snap shot, a good chance (17%)
2–1
4
Ian Cole, Vladislav Kolyachonok · backhand shot on a rebound, a good chance (21%)
3–1
5
Vladislav Kolyachonok, Logan Cooley · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (2%) that found a way in
4–1
3rd period
6
15:28 Fabian Zetterlund EXTRA ATTACKER
Mikael Granlund, Jake Walman · tip in shot, a good chance (17%)
4–2
7
15:53 Mikael Granlund EXTRA ATTACKER
Jake Walman, William Eklund · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (3%) that found a way in
4–3
8
17:18 Tyler Toffoli EXTRA ATTACKER
Jake Walman, Alexander Wennberg · snap shot, a good chance (16%)
4–4
Overtime
9
01:26 Alexander Wennberg PPGWG
Mikael Granlund, Tyler Toffoli · snap shot on a rebound, a great chance (66%)
4–5
No penalties
Goaltending
−0.2
vs expected
41/46 saves · 5 GA · 4.8 xGA Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
−1.5
vs expected
19/23 saves · 4 GA · 2.5 xGA Allowed 1.5 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
Team UTASJS
Shots on goal
23
46
Expected goals
2.5
4.8
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
0/0
1/0
Penalty minutes
0
0