UTA 3–2 ANA Final · W
Mammoth/Schedule/Recap Thu, Mar 13, 2025 · 2024-25 regular season
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 29-25-11
3–2
FinalW
Anaheim Ducks
ANA · 28-30-7
1ST2ND3RDT UTA 11711418339 ANA 081716221 goals · shots on goal
Meeting 3 this season — the Mammoth trail the season series 1–2
UTA 29-25-11 · ANA 28-30-7 · Meeting 3 this season — the Mammoth trail the season series 1–2

Mammoth beat the Ducks

The Mammoth earned it: 4.1 expected goals to 2.0, and a 3–2 win to show for it. Ville Husso stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.

Who had the better chances

The Mammoth created the better chances: 4.1 expected goals to 2.0, on 39 and 21 shots on goal.

UTA 4.1 xG · 39 shots ANA 2.0 xG · 21 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st 1.4 · 0.7
2nd · the swing 1.4 · 0.7
3rd 1.3 · 0.6
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 81.
UTA 81%ANA 19%

Goals and penalties

5 goals · 0 penalties
← Mammoth shoot this way Ducks shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
11:03 Jack McBain
Ian Cole, Josh Doan · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (7%) that found a way in
1–0
2nd period
2
14:31 Alexander Kerfoot
Dylan Guenther, Barrett Hayton · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
2–0
3
15:53 Alex Killorn
Leo Carlsson, Cutter Gauthier · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
2–1
3rd period
4
03:22 Mason McTavish PP
Trevor Zegras, Jackson LaCombe · slap shot, a good chance (10%)
2–2
5
07:03 Dylan Guenther PPGWG
Mikhail Sergachev, Clayton Keller · slap shot, a good chance (10%)
3–2
No penalties
Goaltending
0.0
vs expected
19/21 saves · 2 GA · 2.0 xGA Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
+1.1
vs expected
36/39 saves · 3 GA · 4.1 xGA Stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Team UTAANA
Shots on goal
39
21
Expected goals
4.1
2.0
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
1/0
1/0
Penalty minutes
0
0