Utah Mammoth
UTA · 34-29-12
3–1
FinalW
Calgary Flames
CGY · 35-27-12
1ST2ND3RDT
UTA
1121917328
CGY
012110012134
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 3 this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 3–0
UTA 34-29-12 · CGY 35-27-12 · Meeting 3 this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 3–0
Mammoth beat the Flames
The Mammoth earned it: 3.7 expected goals to 2.1, and a 3–1 win to show for it. Dustin Wolf stopped 1.7 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Mammoth created the better chances: 3.7 expected goals to 2.1, on 28 and 34 shots on goal.
UTA 3.7 xG · 28 shots
CGY 2.1 xG · 34 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st
1.5 · 0.4
2nd · the swing
1.9 · 0.7
3rd
0.4 · 1.0
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Kevin Stenlund · 1st 17:46 · 1–0 · snap shot, a good chance (19%)
2
Barrett Hayton · 2nd 02:25 · 2–0 · backhand shot, a good chance (11%)
3
Rasmus Andersson · 2nd 13:00 · 2–1 · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
4
Clayton Keller · 3rd 19:42 · 3–1 · snap shot, into an empty net
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 75.
UTA 75%CGY 25%
Goals and penalties
4 goals · 0 penalties
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Kevin Stenlund · 1st 17:46 · 1–0
Snap shot, a good chance (19%)
2
Barrett Hayton · 2nd 02:25 · GWG · 2–0
Backhand shot, a good chance (11%)
3
Rasmus Andersson · 2nd 13:00 · 2–1
Slap shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
4
Clayton Keller · 3rd 19:42 · EN · 3–1
Snap shot, into an empty net
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
33/34 saves · 1 GA · 2.1 xGA
Stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
25/27 saves · 2 GA · 3.7 xGA
Stopped 1.7 more goals than an average goalie would have.