UTA 5–1 VGK Final · W
Mammoth/Schedule/Recap Mon, Nov 24, 2025 · 2025-26 regular season
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 12-8-3
5–1
FinalW
Vegas Golden Knights
VGK · 10-5-7
1ST2ND3RDT UTA 2804311523 VGK 08116010134 goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
UTA 12-8-3 · VGK 10-5-7 · Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1

Mammoth beat the Golden Knights

The Mammoth were outchanced (4.4 to 3.1 expected goals) but won 5–1 anyway. Karel Vejmelka stopped 3.4 more goals than an average goalie would have.

Who had the better chances

The Golden Knights created the better chances: 4.4 expected goals to 3.1, on 34 and 23 shots on goal.

UTA 3.1 xG · 23 shots VGK 4.4 xG · 34 shots
0
1
2
3
4
5
1st 1.2 · 0.7
2nd · the swing 0.6 · 2.2
3rd 1.3 · 1.5
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 33.
UTA 33%VGK 67%

Goals and penalties

6 goals · 0 penalties
← Mammoth shoot this way Golden Knights shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
14:54 Dylan Guenther
Logan Cooley, Nate Schmidt · snap shot, a good chance (12%)
1–0
2
16:11 Logan Cooley GWG
Dylan Guenther, Nate Schmidt · wrist shot, a good chance (19%)
2–0
2nd period
3
05:24 Ivan Barbashev
Jack Eichel, Braeden Bowman · backhand shot, a good chance (21%)
2–1
3rd period
4
04:19 Logan Cooley
Unassisted · deflected shot on a rebound, a great chance (28%)
3–1
5
15:41 Logan Cooley EN
Ian Cole · snap shot, into an empty net
4–1
6
17:43 Logan Cooley EN
Unassisted · snap shot, into an empty net
5–1
No penalties
Goaltending
+3.4
vs expected
33/34 saves · 1 GA · 4.4 xGA Stopped 3.4 more goals than an average goalie would have.
+0.1
vs expected
18/21 saves · 3 GA · 3.1 xGA Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
Team UTAVGK
Shots on goal
23
34
Expected goals
3.1
4.4
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
0/0
0/0
Penalty minutes
0
0