UTA
6–3
SEA
Final · W
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 25-20-4
6–3
FinalW
Seattle Kraken
SEA · 21-17-9
1ST2ND3RDT
UTA
11228311631
SEA
1122702321
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 2–0
UTA 25-20-4 · SEA 21-17-9 · Meeting 2 this season — the Mammoth lead the season series 2–0
Mammoth beat the Kraken
The Mammoth earned it: 3.6 expected goals to 3.0, and a 6–3 win to show for it. Philipp Grubauer allowed 1.4 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Mammoth created the better chances: 3.6 expected goals to 3.0, on 31 and 21 shots on goal.
UTA 3.6 xG · 31 shots
SEA 3.0 xG · 21 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st
1.6 · 1.5
2nd
0.9 · 1.3
3rd · the swing
1.0 · 0.2
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Jordan Eberle · 1st 01:09 · 0–1 · backhand shot, a good chance (11%)
2
Kevin Stenlund · 1st 02:47 · 1–1 · snap shot, a great chance (28%)
3
Nate Schmidt · 2nd 00:28 · 2–1 · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (3%) that found a way in
4
Nick Schmaltz · 2nd 04:31 · 3–1 · snap shot, a great chance (36%)
5
Matty Beniers · 2nd 15:11 · 3–2 · wrist shot, a great chance (42%)
6
Chandler Stephenson · 2nd 17:43 · 3–3 · wrist shot, a good chance (24%)
7
Nate Schmidt · 3rd 14:30 · 4–3 · snap shot, a good chance (21%)
8
Lawson Crouse · 3rd 15:12 · 5–3 · snap shot, a good chance (18%)
9
Barrett Hayton · 3rd 19:09 · 6–3 · snap shot, into an empty net
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Mammoth win 58.
UTA 58%SEA 42%
Goals and penalties
9 goals · 0 penalties← Mammoth shoot this way
Kraken shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Jordan Eberle · 1st 01:09 · 0–1
Backhand shot, a good chance (11%)
2
Kevin Stenlund · 1st 02:47 · SH · 1–1
Snap shot, a great chance (28%)
3
Nate Schmidt · 2nd 00:28 · 2–1
Slap shot, a low-percentage shot (3%) that found a way in
4
Nick Schmaltz · 2nd 04:31 · 3–1
Snap shot, a great chance (36%)
5
Matty Beniers · 2nd 15:11 · 3–2
Wrist shot, a great chance (42%)
6
Chandler Stephenson · 2nd 17:43 · 3–3
Wrist shot, a good chance (24%)
7
Nate Schmidt · 3rd 14:30 · GWG · 4–3
Snap shot, a good chance (21%)
8
Lawson Crouse · 3rd 15:12 · 5–3
Snap shot, a good chance (18%)
9
Barrett Hayton · 3rd 19:09 · EN · 6–3
Snap shot, into an empty net
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
18/21 saves · 3 GA · 3.0 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
25/30 saves · 5 GA · 3.6 xGA
Allowed 1.4 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
